Re: Timing chains vs belts

davidtowle@lycosmail.com
Fri, 19 Jun 1998 12:42:24 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Internetdoctor: "Air-con for Peugeot 605 SV 24 1990"
Previous message: Austin Hoover: "bio"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Leung: "Timing chains vs belts"
Next in thread: Steve Leung: "Re: Timing chains vs belts"

I believe the reason is cost (significant difference) but noise plays some role also.

Dave Towle 87 505 SW

---- you wrote:
> What are the pros and cons of timing chains versus belts?
> Why do most modern car engines use belts rather than chains?
> Is it a matter of cost? noise? performance?
> Are belts built in obsolescence?
>
> Steve

-----------------------------------------------------
Get free personalized email at http://email.lycos.com

Next message: Internetdoctor: "Air-con for Peugeot 605 SV 24 1990"
Previous message: Austin Hoover: "bio"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Leung: "Timing chains vs belts"
Next in thread: Steve Leung: "Re: Timing chains vs belts"