------ =_NextPart_001_01BDA0FD.70022240
Content-Type: text/plain
Mort. I think I have to disagree with that. My 86's (one wagon and one
sedan) both had the same engine. As a matter of fact, the only
difference I can tell between them is the way the transmission mounts.
Ray
> ----------
> From: SENIORMKT@aol.com[SMTP:SENIORMKT@aol.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 1998 11:26 AM
> To: davidtowle@lycosmail.com; Peugeot@padui.org
> Subject: Re: 505 turbo's--does their performance vary from unit
> to unit?
>
> Your comment regarding difference in sedans and wagons is correct up
> to 1989
> (my year) when sedan and wagons both shared the NYTEA engine and the
> same
> turbo and settings. Earlier years had a year or do lag on the wagons
> incorporating succeeding engine types. 1989 was the first level
> playing field
> year.
>
> Mort
>
>
------ =_NextPart_001_01BDA0FD.70022240
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
Mort. I think = I have to disagree with that. My 86's (one wagon and one sedan) = both had the same engine. As a matter of fact, the only = difference I can tell between them is the way the transmission = mounts. Ray
----------
From: SENIORMKT@aol.com[SMTP:SENIORMKT@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, =
June 26, 1998 11:26 AM
To: davidtowle@lycosmail.com; Peugeot@padui.org
Subject: =
Re: 505 =
turbo's--does their performance vary from unit to unit?
Your comment regarding difference in =
sedans and wagons is correct up to 1989
(my year) when sedan and wagons both =
shared the NYTEA engine and the same
turbo and settings. Earlier =
years had a year or do lag on the wagons
incorporating succeeding engine =
types. 1989 was the first level playing field
year.
Mort