Perhaps I should've said, Volumetric Inefficiency.
-----Original
From: Leon [mailto:leon.murphy@btinternet.com]
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 2:00 PM
To: peugeot-L@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [Peugeot-L] Re: How fast on video/mine's slower than yours!!!
Hi,
How can an 8.1 litre engine producing 340 bhp be classed as volumetric
efficient!?
BMW M3, 3.2 321 bhp N/A
BMW M5, 5.0 400 bhp N/A
Skyline R34 GT-R 2.6, 276 bhp Twin turbo
McLaren F1 6.1, 627 bhp N/A
Aston Martin Vantage 5.3, 550 bhp Twin superchargers
TVR Griffith 500 5.0, 320 bhp, N/A and its got pushrods, and only 2 valves
per cylinder...
Some proper cars with proper engines! ;-)
Happy New Year to all!
Leon
(UK 96 406 Dual Fuel)
-----Original
From: Alan Samet [mailto:sameta@bellsouth.net]
Sent: 31 December 2000 23:13
To: jsgrubbs@hotmail.com; peugeot-L@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [Peugeot-L] Re: How fast on video/mine's slower than
yours!!!
"You can't beat me in that little car!" -- a famous quote from the driver
of
an new F150....
But seriously, once GM releases the new 8.1 Liter Vortec engine, Turbo
owners will have nothing to talk about. The new engine, reported to
produce
a whopping 340 HP sets new records in volumetric efficiency. You can read
about it at http://www.chevrolet.com/ somewhere under Suburban...
eGroups Sponsor
Recommended format for your email subject lines:
Model # [Model Letters] Year Subject
Examples:
505 88 V6 Mileage
405 Mi16 89 Ignition Coil source?
************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue 02 Jan 2001 - 01:16:44 UTC