Peugeot Re: Poor Used Part Buying Experience

From: boz (boz@t-3.cc)
Date: Sat 23 Feb 2002 - 18:51:04 EST

  • Next message: fwbillb: "'92 SW8 Intermittent Heat"

    Corey L. Brown wrote:
    "If you did this at junk yard or with a new part they would laugh at you
    if you tried to return it..."

    You know what Corey? A new part wouldn't be defective, and a reputable
    junk yard doesn't sell broken parts, either. So there'd have been nobody
    laughing at me. In all my years of buying parts anywhere, I've never had
    such an experience. That fact speaks volumes, I think.....

    I guess my crime is breaking the glass during my last ditch effort to
    salvage something of value from that mirror. I broke a bit more of
    something that was already very broken, i.e., broken, stripped pivot
    mount. I guess that can happen on occasion when someone (like me) has a
    'can do' philosphy in trying to make the most out of a difficult
    situation. Obviously, it didn't work out in the end, but that's life.

    The real issue here is one of misrepresenting the conditon of a used
    part. If that hadn't been done, there would be no issue in this case.
    I'd have been happy as punch with a nice mirror installed in about 10
    minutes. And being a stickler in saying that a refund was in order if I
    hadn't broken the glass is also a bit disingenuous. That mirror was
    already defective--the only reason anyone would want it back (without
    the broken glass) would likely be to try to resell it to somebody else
    (perish the thought!).

    Perhaps next time I try to buy a part from someone here, I'd better ask
    everyone on the list if said party can be relied upon or not. And that's
    a sad state of affairs considering our sort of 'brotherhood of Peugeot
    owners' here. However, I do truly think most on this list would not do
    such a thing as what happened to me.

    --Brian O.

    ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat 23 Feb 2002 - 18:51:52 EST