Peugeot Re: Re: Peugeot Back ... rwd comments

From: Joseph Ashment (wyofisher@earthlink.net)
Date: Thu 16 Dec 2004 - 23:17:45 EST

  • Next message: Stephen Cotterell: "XUD7T sump plug"

    That just about sums it up.

    > [Original Message]
    > From: Gnarly 505stx <gnarly505stx@yahoo.com>
    > To: <peugeot-L@yahoogroups.com>
    > Date: 12/15/2004 2:06:03 AM
    > Subject: Re: [Peugeot-L] Re: Peugeot Back ... rwd comments
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Thomas John <thomas@ikonengold.de> wrote:
    >
    > ....I totally disagree about the statement "front wheel drive is the
    > future".
    >
    >
    >
    > ofcourse RWD is superior. race cars use it, police cars (USA) use it
    (with fringe exceptions), prestige cars use it, etc. when i sold new
    volvos (1/2 rwd), i used to say, "Real cars are rear wheel drive..." and we
    sold a lot more 960s than nearly all other volvo sales people :)
    >
    > but first and foremost, car manufacture is a business, for better or for
    worse...
    >
    > i believe its apparent that if companies, especially small ones in the
    large tight market want to survive, FWD is necessarily the future,
    especially if they are going to take advantage of the American market.
    fwd is cheaper and easier to build, with higher profit margins.
    >
    > as volvo-isti and as Swedes, we were sadder than the next guy to see a
    company with a strict RWD heritage step away from it in Sweden. and now
    that the company has backing with DEEP pockets, we see other volvo-isti
    irrationally hoping the company can fish out a new RWD platform, but it's
    futile. normal new car buyers are almost NOTHING at all like us. only the
    smallest, most insignificant numbers of them care or know anything at all
    about true driving dynamics and the principles of motoring tradition.
    those are just esoteric concepts that dont make the list of what car
    companies need to do to make money, especially when its easy to simulate
    those attributes to a mostly ignorant buyer. and in the name of profit and
    survival, there is nothing disingenuous about it. they never said they
    were defenders of the traditions of the motor car. we just decided we
    would ascribe that role to these companies, because they used to be so slow
    to change and because evolution was more
    > acceptable than revolution in auto design. in the newer, tighter
    market, these conditions just arent so anymore.
    >
    > sad!
    >
    > it's just as honda says here in the US, "SIMPLIFY."
    >
    > its amusing to see a few american cars coming back around in NEW rwd
    versions, necessarily with sophisticated traction control. but its also
    interesting to see the results: the first one, lincoln LS (on the Jag S
    type platform) FAILED miserably and lincoln canceled plans to introduce
    another RWD and is now planning FWD only.
    >
    > Cadillac introduced an Opel here as the Catera. no one bought it and its
    a target or ridicule, but it was just a place holder until the new cads
    were ready. two are RWD and just went on sale. mostly, no one talks about
    them being RWD, but they talk about their other styling characteristics.
    >
    > chrysler just introduced RWD again in its top of the line (with much help
    from parent Daimler-Benz) and everyone is talking about RWD in this car.
    we'll see !
    >
    > but, on the ground, in show rooms (a place i know well!), especially in
    the northeast, new car buyers in the $25,000 - $37,000 range still ask, "Is
    it front wheel drive?" in the first 45 seconds! FWD is the simplest,
    easiest "fix" in the minds of most american new car buyers to the problem
    of driving everyday on snowy, icey, slushy roads... not to say you cant
    educate some of these people, but its the mainstream, mass market where
    most of the $ $ $ are for better or for worse i say.
    >
    >
    >
    > jay
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------
    > Do you Yahoo!?
    > Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good.
    >
    > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Recommended format for your email subject lines:
    > Model # [Model Letters] Year Subject
    >
    > Examples:
    > 505 88 V6 Mileage
    > 405 Mi16 89 Ignition Coil source?
    > ************************************************
    > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank email message to
    PEUGEOT-L-UNSUBSCRIBE@EGROUPS.COM
    > ************************************************
    >
    > Yahoo! Groups Links
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >

    ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
    Yahoo! Autos. Everything you need to know about buying
    or selling a car. FREE Quotes, 360° Tours, Research,
    Blue Book, Compare Vehicles, Buy Used
    http://us.click.yahoo.com/kEZsdA/bwnGAA/YiGOAA/4jLplB/TM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------~->

    Recommended format for your email subject lines:
    Model # [Model Letters] Year Subject

    Examples:
    505 88 V6 Mileage
    405 Mi16 89 Ignition Coil source?
    ************************************************
    To unsubscribe from this list send a blank email message to PEUGEOT-L-UNSUBSCRIBE@EGROUPS.COM



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu 16 Dec 2004 - 23:18:25 EST